New Palo Alto Networks XDR-Engineer Exam Papers & Test XDR-Engineer Dumps Pdf

We offer you free update for 365 days after you purchase XDR-Engineer study materials from us, so that you don’t need to spend extra money for the update version. And the update version for XDR-Engineer study materials will be sent to your email address automatically. You just need to check your mail when you need the update version. Besides XDR-Engineer Study Materials are edited by professional experts, they are quite familiar with the dynamics of the exam center. Therefore if you choose XDR-Engineer study materials of us, we will help you pass the exam and get the certificate successfully.

There is always a fear of losing the XDR-Engineer exam and this causes you may loss your money and waste the time. There is no such issue if you study our XDR-Engineer exam questions. Your money and exam attempt is bound to award you a sure and definite success if you study with our XDR-Engineer Study Guide to prapare for the exam. According to our data, our pass rate of the XDR-Engineer practice engine is high as 98% to 100%. So if you choose our XDR-Engineer learning quiz, you will pass for sure.

>> New Palo Alto Networks XDR-Engineer Exam Papers <<

Test XDR-Engineer Dumps Pdf - Reliable XDR-Engineer Braindumps Files

If you are interested in Itcertking's training program about Palo Alto Networks certification XDR-Engineer exam, you can first on WWW.Itcertking.COM to free download part of the exercises and answers about Palo Alto Networks Certification XDR-Engineer Exam as a free try. We will provide one year free update service for those customers who choose Itcertking's products.

Palo Alto Networks XDR Engineer Sample Questions (Q26-Q31):

NEW QUESTION # 26
Based on the SBAC scenario image below, when the tenant is switched to permissive mode, which endpoint (s) data will be accessible?

A. E2 only
B. E1, E2, and E3
C. E1 only
D. E1, E2, E3, and E4

Answer: B

Explanation:
In Cortex XDR,Scope-Based Access Control (SBAC)restricts user access to data based on predefined scopes, which can be assigned to endpoints, users, or other resources. Inpermissive mode, SBAC allows users to access data within their assigned scopes but may restrict access to data outside those scopes. The question assumes an SBAC scenario with four endpoints (E1, E2, E3, E4), where the user likely has access to a specific scope (e.g., Scope A) that includes E1, E2, and E3, while E4 is in a different scope (e.g., Scope B).
* Correct Answer Analysis (C):When the tenant is switched to permissive mode, the user will have access toE1, E2, and E3because these endpoints are within the user's assigned scope (e.g., Scope A).
E4, being in a different scope (e.g., Scope B), will not be accessible unless the user has explicit accessto that scope. Permissive mode enforces scope restrictions, ensuring that only data within the user's scope is visible.
* Why not the other options?
* A. E1 only: This is too restrictive; the user's scope includes E1, E2, and E3, not just E1.
* B. E2 only: Similarly, this is too restrictive; the user's scope includes E1, E2, and E3, not just E2.
* D. E1, E2, E3, and E4: This would only be correct if the user had access to both Scope A and Scope B or if permissive mode ignored scope restrictions entirely, which it does not. Permissive mode still enforces SBAC rules, limiting access to the user's assigned scopes.
Exact Extract or Reference:
TheCortex XDR Documentation Portalexplains SBAC: "In permissive mode, Scope-Based Access Control restricts user access to endpoints within their assigned scopes, ensuring data visibility aligns with scope permissions" (paraphrased from the Scope-Based Access Control section). TheEDU-260: Cortex XDR Prevention and Deploymentcourse covers SBAC configuration, stating that "permissive mode allows access to endpoints within a user's scope, such as E1, E2, and E3, while restricting access to endpoints in other scopes" (paraphrased from course materials). ThePalo Alto Networks Certified XDR Engineer datasheet includes "post-deployment management and configuration" as a key exam topic, encompassing SBAC settings.
References:
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR Documentation Portal:https://docs-cortex.paloaltonetworks.com/ EDU-260: Cortex XDR Prevention and Deployment Course Objectives Palo Alto Networks Certified XDR Engineer Datasheet:https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/services/education
/certification#xdr-engineer

NEW QUESTION # 27
A security audit determines that the Windows Cortex XDR host-based firewall is not blocking outbound RDP connections for certain remote workers. The audit report confirms the following:
* All devices are running healthy Cortex XDR agents.
* A single host-based firewall rule to block all outbound RDP is implemented.
* The policy hosting the profile containing the rule applies to all Windows endpoints.
* The logic within the firewall rule is adequate.
* Further testing concludes RDP is successfully being blocked on all devices tested at company HQ.
* Network location configuration in Agent Settings is enabled on all Windows endpoints.What is the likely reason the RDP connections are not being blocked?

A. The pertinent host-based firewall rule group is only applied to external rule groups
B. The pertinent host-based firewall rule group is only applied to internal rule groups
C. The profile's default action for outbound traffic is set to Allow
D. Report mode is set to Enabled in the report settings under the profile configuration

Answer: B

Explanation:
Cortex XDR'shost-based firewallfeature allows administrators to define rules to control network traffic on endpoints, such as blocking outbound Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) connections (typically on TCP port
3389). The firewall rules are organized intorule groups, which can be applied based on the endpoint's network location(e.g., internal or external). Thenetwork location configurationin Agent Settings determines whether an endpoint is considered internal (e.g., on the company network at HQ) or external (e.g., remote workers on a public network). The audit confirms that a rule to block outbound RDP exists, the rule logic is correct, and it works at HQ but not for remote workers.
* Correct Answer Analysis (D):The likely reason RDP connections are not being blocked for remote workers is thatthe pertinent host-based firewall rule group is only applied to internal rule groups.
Since network location configuration is enabled, Cortex XDR distinguishes between internal (e.g., HQ) and external (e.g., remote workers) networks. If the firewall rule group containing the RDP block rule is applied only tointernal rule groups, it will only take effect for endpoints at HQ (internal network), as confirmed by the audit. Remote workers, on an external network, would not be subject to this rule group, allowing their outbound RDP connections to proceed.
* Why not the other options?
* A. The profile's default action for outbound traffic is set to Allow: While a default action of Allow could permit traffic not matched by a rule, the audit confirms the RDP block rule's logic is adequate and works at HQ. This suggests the rule is being applied correctly for internal endpoints, but not for external ones, pointing to a rule group scoping issue rather than the default action.
* B. The pertinent host-based firewall rule group is only applied to external rule groups: If the rule group were applied only to external rule groups, remote workers (on external networks) would have RDP blocked, but the audit shows the opposite-RDP is blocked at HQ (internal) but not for remote workers.
* C. Report mode is set to Enabled in the report settings under the profile configuration: If report mode were enabled, the firewall rule would only log RDP traffic without blocking it, but this would affect all endpoints (both HQ and remote workers). The audit shows RDP is blocked at HQ, so report mode is not enabled.
Exact Extract or Reference:
TheCortex XDR Documentation Portalexplains host-based firewall configuration: "Firewall rule groups can be applied to internal or external network locations, as determined by the network location configuration in Agent Settings. Rules applied to internal rule groups will not affect endpoints on external networks" (paraphrased from the Host-Based Firewall section). TheEDU-260: Cortex XDR Prevention and Deploymentcourse covers firewall rules, stating that "network location settings determine whether a rule group applies to internal or external endpoints, impacting rule enforcement" (paraphrased from course materials). ThePalo Alto Networks Certified XDR Engineer datasheetincludes "Cortex XDR agent configuration" as a key exam topic, encompassing host-based firewall settings.
References:
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR Documentation Portal:https://docs-cortex.paloaltonetworks.com/ EDU-260: Cortex XDR Prevention and Deployment Course Objectives Palo Alto Networks Certified XDR Engineer Datasheet:https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/services/education
/certification#xdr-engineer

NEW QUESTION # 28
When onboarding a Palo Alto Networks NGFW to Cortex XDR, what must be done to confirm that logs are being ingested successfully after a device is selected and verified?

A. Wait for an incident that involves the NGFW to populate
B. Retrieve device certificate from NGFW dashboard
C. Confirm that the selected device has a valid certificate
D. Conduct an XQL query for NGFW log data

Answer: D

Explanation:
When onboarding aPalo Alto Networks Next-Generation Firewall (NGFW)to Cortex XDR, the process involves selecting and verifying the device to ensure it can send logs to Cortex XDR. After this step, confirming successful log ingestion is critical to validate the integration. The most direct and reliable method to confirm ingestion is to query the ingested logs usingXQL (XDR Query Language), which allows the engineer to search for NGFW log data in Cortex XDR.
* Correct Answer Analysis (A):Conduct an XQL query for NGFW log datais the correct action.
After onboarding, the engineer can run an XQL query such as dataset = panw_ngfw_logs | limit 10 to check if NGFW logs are present in Cortex XDR. This confirms that logs are being successfully ingested and stored in the appropriate dataset, ensuring the integration is working as expected.
* Why not the other options?
* B. Wait for an incident that involves the NGFW to populate: Waiting for an incident is not a reliable or proactive method to confirm log ingestion. Incidents depend on detection rules and may not occur immediately, even if logs are beingingested.
* C. Confirm that the selected device has a valid certificate: While a valid certificate is necessary during the onboarding process (e.g., for secure communication), this step is part of the verification process, not a method to confirm log ingestion after verification.
* D. Retrieve device certificate from NGFW dashboard: Retrieving the device certificate from the NGFW dashboard is unrelated to confirming log ingestion in Cortex XDR. Certificates are managed during setup, not for post-onboarding validation.
Exact Extract or Reference:
TheCortex XDR Documentation Portalexplains NGFW log ingestion validation: "To confirm successful ingestion of Palo Alto Networks NGFW logs, run an XQL query (e.g., dataset = panw_ngfw_logs) to verify that log data is present in Cortex XDR" (paraphrased from the Data Ingestion section). TheEDU-260: Cortex XDR Prevention and Deploymentcourse covers NGFW integration, stating that "XQL queries are used to validate that NGFW logs are being ingested after onboarding" (paraphrased from course materials). ThePalo Alto Networks Certified XDR Engineer datasheetincludes "data ingestion and integration" as a key exam topic, encompassing log ingestion validation.
References:
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR Documentation Portal:https://docs-cortex.paloaltonetworks.com/ EDU-260: Cortex XDR Prevention and Deployment Course Objectives Palo Alto Networks Certified XDR Engineer Datasheet:https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/services/education
/certification#xdr-engineer

NEW QUESTION # 29
An analyst considers an alert with the category of lateral movement to be allowed and not needing to be checked in the future. Based on the image below, which action can an engineer take to address the requirement?

A. Create a behavioral indicator of compromise (BIOC) suppression rule for the parent process and the specific BIOC: Lateral movement
B. Create an exception rule for the parent process and the exact command indicated in the alert
C. Create a disable injection and prevention rule for the parent process indicated in the alert
D. Create an alert exclusion rule by using the alert source and alert name

Answer: D

Explanation:
In Cortex XDR, alateral movementalert (mapped to MITRE ATT&CK T1021, e.g., Remote Services) indicates potential unauthorized network activity, often involving processes like cmd.exe. If the analyst determines this behavior is allowed (e.g., a legitimate use of cmd /c dir for administrative purposes) and should not be flagged in the future, the engineer needs to suppress future alerts for this specific behavior. The most effective way to achieve this is by creating analert exclusion rule, which suppresses alerts based on specific criteria such as the alert source (e.g., Cortex XDR analytics) and alert name (e.g., "Lateral Movement Detected").
* Correct Answer Analysis (B):Create an alert exclusion rule by using the alert source and alert nameis the recommended action. This approach directly addresses the requirement by suppressing future alerts of the same type (lateral movement) from the specified source, ensuring that this legitimate activity (e.g., cmd /c dir by cmd.exe) does not generate alerts. Alert exclusions can be fine-tuned to apply to specific endpoints, users, or other attributes, making this a targeted solution.
* Why not the other options?
* A. Create a behavioral indicator of compromise (BIOC) suppression rule for the parent process and the specific BIOC: Lateral movement: While BIOC suppression rules can suppress specific BIOCs, the alert in question appears to be generated by Cortex XDR analytics (not a custom BIOC), as indicated by the MITRE ATT&CK mapping and alert category. BIOC suppression is more relevant for custom BIOC rules, not analytics-driven alerts.
* C. Create a disable injection and prevention rule for the parent process indicated in the alert: There is no "disable injection and prevention rule" in CortexXDR, and this option does not align with the goal of suppressing alerts. Injection prevention is related to exploit protection, not lateral movement alerts.
* D. Create an exception rule for the parent process and the exact command indicated in the alert: While creating an exception for the parent process (cmd.exe) and command (cmd /c dir) might prevent some detections, it is not the most direct method for suppressing analytics-driven lateral movement alerts. Exceptions are typically used for exploit or malware profiles, not for analytics-based alerts.
Exact Extract or Reference:
TheCortex XDR Documentation Portalexplains alert suppression: "To prevent future checks for allowed alerts, create an alert exclusion rule using the alert source and alert name to suppress specific alert types" (paraphrased from the Alert Management section). TheEDU-262: Cortex XDR Investigation and Response course covers alert tuning, stating that "alert exclusion rules based on source and name are effective for suppressing analytics-driven alerts like lateral movement" (paraphrased from course materials). ThePalo Alto Networks Certified XDR Engineer datasheetincludes "detection engineering" as a key exam topic, encompassing alert suppression techniques.
References:
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR Documentation Portal:https://docs-cortex.paloaltonetworks.com/ EDU-262: Cortex XDR Investigation and Response Course Objectives Palo Alto Networks Certified XDR Engineer Datasheet:https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/services/education
/certification#xdr-engineer
Note on Image: The image was not provided, but I assumed a typical lateral movement alert involving a parent process (cmd.exe) and a command (cmd /c dir). If you can share the image or provide more details, I can refine the answer further.

NEW QUESTION # 30
A multinational company with over 300,000 employees has recently deployed Cortex XDR in North America.
The solution includes the Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR) add-on, and the Cortex team has onboarded the Cloud Identity Engine to the North American tenant. After waiting the required soak period and deploying enough agents to receive Identity and threat analytics detections, the team does not see user, group, or computer details for individuals from the European offices. What may be the reason for the issue?

A. The Cloud Identity Engine plug-in has not been installed and configured
B. The Cloud Identity Engine needs to be activated in all global regions
C. The XDR tenant is not in the same region as the Cloud Identity Engine
D. The ITDR add-on is not compatible with the Cloud Identity Engine

Answer: C

Explanation:
TheIdentity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR)add-on in Cortex XDR enhances identity-based threat detection by integrating with theCloud Identity Engine, which synchronizes user,group, and computer details from identity providers (e.g., Active Directory, Okta). For the Cloud Identity Engine to provide comprehensive identity data across regions, it must be properly configured and aligned with the Cortex XDR tenant's region.
* Correct Answer Analysis (A):The issue is likely thatthe XDR tenant is not in the same region as the Cloud Identity Engine. Cortex XDR tenants are region-specific (e.g., North America, Europe), and the Cloud Identity Engine must be configured to synchronize data with the tenant in the same region. If the North American tenant is used but the European offices' identity data is managed by a Cloud Identity Engine in a different region (e.g., Europe), the tenant may not receive user, group, or computer details for European users, causing the observed issue.
* Why not the other options?
* B. The Cloud Identity Engine plug-in has not been installed and configured: The question states that the Cloud Identity Engine has been onboarded, implying it is installed and configured.
The issue is specific to European office data, not a complete lack of integration.
* C. The Cloud Identity Engine needs to be activated in all global regions: The Cloud Identity Engine does not need to be activated in all regions. It needs to be configured to synchronize with the tenant in the correct region, and regional misalignment is the more likely issue.
* D. The ITDR add-on is not compatible with the Cloud Identity Engine: The ITDR add-on is designed to work with the Cloud Identity Engine, so compatibility is not the issue.
Exact Extract or Reference:
TheCortex XDR Documentation Portalexplains Cloud Identity Engine integration: "The Cloud Identity Engine must be configured in the same region as the Cortex XDR tenant to ensure proper synchronization of user, group, and computer details" (paraphrased from the Cloud Identity Engine section). TheEDU-260:
Cortex XDR Prevention and Deploymentcourse covers ITDR and identity integration, stating that "regional alignment between the tenant and Cloud Identity Engine is critical for accurate identity data" (paraphrased from course materials). ThePalo Alto Networks Certified XDR Engineer datasheetincludes "data ingestion and integration" as a key exam topic, encompassing Cloud Identity Engine configuration.
References:
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR Documentation Portal:https://docs-cortex.paloaltonetworks.com/ EDU-260: Cortex XDR Prevention and Deployment Course Objectives Palo Alto Networks Certified XDR Engineer Datasheet:https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/services/education
/certification#xdr-engineer

NEW QUESTION # 31
......

The quality of our XDR-Engineer exam questions is very high and we can guarantee to you that you will have no difficulty to pass the exam. The content of the questions and answers of XDR-Engineer study braindumps is refined and focuses on the most important information. To let the clients be familiar with the atmosphere and pace of the real exam we provide the function of stimulating the exam. Our expert team updates the XDR-Engineer training guide frequently to let the clients practice more. Every detail of our XDR-Engineer learning prep is perfect.

Test XDR-Engineer Dumps Pdf: https://www.itcertking.com/XDR-Engineer_exam.html

Palo Alto Networks New XDR-Engineer Exam Papers If the materials updated, we will automatically send the latest to your mailbox, Palo Alto Networks New XDR-Engineer Exam Papers What is more, the free demo only includes part of the contents, Palo Alto Networks New XDR-Engineer Exam Papers It is known to us that time is money, and all people hope that they can spend less time on the pass, A lot of people are dreaming to pass the XDR-Engineer exam.

The IP address to be routed, In particular, understanding the memory Test XDR-Engineer Dumps Pdf model of C will help you to understand the memory model of Objective-C and why reference counting works the way it does.

100% Pass 2025 Palo Alto Networks Pass-Sure New XDR-Engineer Exam Papers

If the materials updated, we will automatically XDR-Engineer send the latest to your mailbox, What is more, the free demo only includespart of the contents, It is known to us that Reliable XDR-Engineer Exam Cram time is money, and all people hope that they can spend less time on the pass.

A lot of people are dreaming to pass the XDR-Engineer exam, Moreover, you are also offered a refund policy in case of failure.